AMAYA · METHODOLOGY V1.0 · PEER‑REVIEWED
Seven pillars.
One integrated rating.
IDI is composed across seven Core Company Quality pillars that together define a company’s durability, defensibility and readiness for the AI transition. Ratings are supported by an evidence ledger and issued under a stated confidence and methodology version.
THE FRAMEWORK
- / 01AI‑ReadinessStrategic posture, model strategy and capability to operate at the AI frontier.
- / 02Technology & ProductArchitectural durability, technical defensibility and product differentiation in an AI‑native environment.
- / 03Data & Model PositionData assets, model ownership, deployment strategy and exposure to commoditisation.
- / 04Team & Org DesignTalent density, leadership and organisational design fit for an AI‑era operating model.
- / 05Legal & RegulatoryJurisdictional exposure, IP posture, and readiness for AI regulation across operating markets.
- / 06Market & CommercialCustomer durability, contractual depth and AI‑era market positioning.
- / 07Capital & ResilienceCapital structure, runway, unit economics and structural ability to absorb transition risk.
PRINCIPLES
Methodology is the moat.
The discipline of how a rating is composed is the rating. AMAYA is built so the methodology behind every conclusion is disclosed, versioned and peer‑reviewable.
- 01Evidence precedes conclusion. Conclusions must trace to source.
- 02Confidence is declared, not implied.
- 03Methodology is versioned. Ratings carry the version they were issued under.
- 04Human approval is a first‑class step, not a manual layer added afterwards.
- 05Edits, overrides and reissues are preserved in the record.
- 06Comparability is a property of the framework, not of the model.